Guebuza On Results of Local Development Fund

Sunday, May 25th, 2008

Mozambican President Armando Guebuza, drawing up a balance sheet of his week long visit to the northern province of Cabo Delgado, told reporters that the most visible result of the Local Initiative Development Fund is that flour mills are now appearing throughout the countryside.

Under this fund, annually each district receives at least seven million meticais from the state budget for initiatives intended to increase food production and generate jobs. The money is supposed to be lent to businesses and individuals with viable projects: repayment of these loans will produce a revolving fund that can be continually invested in district development.

The increase in the number of small flour mills, Guebuza said, meant that peasant farmers did not have such long distances to travel to mill their maize, and the time they saved could be used in other activities.

He was also impressed by the increase in the number of small brick factories, producing construction materials that can be used to build better homes that are more resistant to heavy rains and high winds.

Guebuza claimed that the fund had also stimulated the rise in the number of associations of peasants producing rice, vegetables and cotton.

But the President warned against imagining that handing over seven million meticais to each of the 128 districts would solve all problems. It might solve an immediate problem of shortage of funds for development, but other challenges soon arose - such as the need to train those who receive the money in business management.

“We have insisted on the need to train the people who ask for loans”, said Guebuza. “This is our current challenge”. Such training was needed to ensure that the beneficiaries would be able to repay the interest-free loans.

Asked whether the state would recover the old state farms as a way of contributing to a Mozambican green revolution, Guebuza said that running farms was not the state’s job.

Instead the state “takes responsibility for creating a healthy environment so that agricultural production occurs”. It would encourage producers, including the commercial farming sector, and was concerned to train the necessary high level specialists who could play a key role in increasing production.

All newspapers need to jump on online video

Saturday, May 17th, 2008

The Newspaper Association of America (NAA) has released a report about the increase of online video (11.5 billion videos viewed in March, according Comscore). Its title is “Zooming In on Online Video: A Development & Growth Guide for Newspaper Web Sites.” Here is the download link.

Main conclusion: everyone needs to jump on online video. “While still a small percentage of total and local online advertising, online video represents an enormous opportunity for newspapers to grow revenue and audience,” says the report.

“As competition heats up for online video mindshare, newspapers have an excellent opportunity to leverage their skills and content and capture an even larger share of online advertising spending.”

Local online video advertising was a $400 million business in 2007, according to Borrell Associates.

The survey shows that online video is not solely the domain of the Web department. Although online editors and producers are involved in shooting, editing and publishing video for the newspaper’s Web site, reporters and photographers are also heavily involved.

Public Radio Tries to Reignite Its Public

Sunday, April 27th, 2008

PUBLIC radio is drawing its largest audience ever, some 28 million listeners nationwide each week. But if it’s a golden era, you wouldn’t know it from the frenetic activity to remake the genre.

In WNYC’s antiquated downtown Manhattan studios, the veteran National Public Radio and NBC journalist John Hockenberry and his co-host, Adaora Udoji, formerly of CNN, are rehearsing to find a comfortable rapport for their new live morning news program, which begins Monday. Flush from a $2 million Knight Foundation grant, this program, “The Takeaway” is designed with it partner, Public Radio International, and collaborators including The New York Times, the BBC World Service and the Boston public station WGBH, to be a stark counterpoint to the taped interviews on NPR’s venerable “Morning Edition.”

In the Chicago area, an 11-month-old FM station, :Vocalo, never mentions that it is affiliated with Chicago Public Radio. There’s no “All Things Considered” or “Car Talk”; instead hosts weave together interviews, commentary, reports and music, culled from user submissions to a companion Web site, vocalo.org.

NPR itself started the Web-radio hybrid “Bryant Park Project” last fall, hoping younger listeners would like to hear lively hosts banter about news and culture. And NPR’s year-old midday talk show “Tell Me More,” anchored by the former “Nightline” correspondent Michel Martin, aims at diverse new voices.

The urgency to find new formats is driven by audience research that can be read as glass half-empty or half-full. The 28 million weekly public radio listeners recorded by Arbitron in spring 2007 topped the previous high of 27.5 million in 2004. But the research also showed that the listeners were tuning in for shorter periods.

Public radio “had an enormous surge in listening over about a 10-year period from the mid ’90s up through about 2003, principally driven by a huge response to public radio’s news and information programming,” said Tom Thomas, co-chief executive officer of the Station Resource Group, a public radio consortium. But since 2003 “the audience has essentially been flat,” he said.

To address this, the consortium recently received a Corporation for Public Broadcasting grant to identify ways to get the audience growing again, and “Everything is on the table,” Mr. Thomas said.

Last year some 1,400 people entered the Public Radio Talent Quest, an online search for new hosts run by the Public Radio Exchange, a Web site, prx.org, where independent radio producers market their content. None of the three winners — a science blogger, a slam poet and a nonprofit executive who is a storyteller — reflect that typical public radio sound, said Jake Shapiro, the exchange’s executive director.

Executives stress that the new programming won’t abandon in-depth news, just “get away from a tone that feels too clubby,” said Graham Griffith, executive producer of “The Takeaway.” Nor do they want to tinker with existing programs; they just want more options for more people.

“A lot of the research that guided public radio’s direction in the last 30 years focused on us discovering a niche we could serve and serve well,” of highly educated, news-craving listeners, said Maxie Jackson, WNYC’s senior director for program development. But, he added, that formula “didn’t appeal to people of color.” He called it an issue of tonality.

“The Takeaway,” Mr. Jackson said, could be a model. It will be interactive, he said, and multicultural, with “voices, perspectives, contributors and stories that are relevant to a wide swath of people.” Its tone, he said, “has to be more compelling, with more verve.”

“People want to feel that the hosts are committed to the topic,” he added.

At a recent run-through, an Iowa State University economist discussed global food riots, and an assistant professor at Morehouse College dissected the Atlanta Ballet’s collaboration with the hip-hop star Big Boi. Listeners were encouraged to comment online about how fuel costs would affect vacation plans.

The morning hours where radio thrives have become a battleground, even though NPR’s “Morning Edition,” with 12.9 million listeners a week, is the second-most-listened to national radio program, behind Rush Limbaugh’s.

NPR itself created “Bryant Park Project” because the organization is “mission-driven, and if we can reach more people, great,” said Ellen Weiss, NPR’s vice president for news.

The program had a tough start. One host, Luke Burbank, quit just before the first day, Oct. 1, although he didn’t leave until mid-December. The Remaining host, Alison Stewart, is on maternity leave. Online listening is growing, and with few broadcast stations carrying the program, a plan to go Internet-only has been discussed. Ms. Weiss said that would not happen but declined to discuss coming changes.

Meanwhile in February, with competition looming, NPR cut the fees to carry “Morning Edition” that stations had long complained about by a total of $5 million (to take effect next fiscal year).

Still, stations in Boston, Cape Cod, Baltimore, Miami and across Wisconsin have committed to give “The Takeaway” a try, although “Morning Edition” will still be widely available in those places. On WNYC “Morning Edition” will shrink to five hours between the AM and FM stations, to make way for two hours of “The Takeaway.”

By June 30 the new program will be broadcasting four hours daily, although not all stations will carry the whole thing. Mr. Griffith envisions “The Takeaway” as a “breakfast table,” where a nationwide conversation can take place. Mr. Hockenberry uses a more high-tech metaphor, calling it in an interview “a massive multiplayer game, the rules and title of which are, basically, curiosity.”

RICK KUSHMAN: A primer on the coming digital wave

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

Earlier this week, we covered the 2009 conversion of TV to digital, except for all the really good questions that scores of people have asked since.I’m going to answer some of them today, but first, a quick reminder of what this is about.At midnight next Feb. 17, all analog television transmissions will stop, and TV signals will become digital. If you have any kind of digital cable or satellite service, or you get your reception from an antenna but have a digital receiver inside your TV, you won’t notice.If you use an antenna for an analog TV, you will need a converter box. Those run $50 to $70, and government discount coupons worth $40 are available. Each household can get two coupons, but sellers accept only one coupon per converter.Also, digital transmission is already going on, so you can switch at any time.After that, it gets a bit more detailed, and I’m going to break down the questions into a few basic categories:-Converter boxesEvery TV in the house needs its own digital connection, either through cable, satellite or a converter.The boxes are supposed to be very easy to connect, and you shouldn’t need to pay for help. The boxes are becoming available at most major electronics retailers.-CableIf you have cable, you won’t have to get a converter or shop for other equipment. But that doesn’t mean your cable company won’t force a change on you, and if they do, they’ll come to you.If you have digital cable now, nothing more is needed. But, if you have an analog box, or analog cable through a wall connection, it will depend on your company.Some cable companies will let you keep the analog equipment, and they’ll convert the signal for you. But many companies are switching to all-digital - because it’s better for them - meaning they’ll bring you a digital box.If they do go all-digital, each TV in the house will need its own box.Will that cost you more? It depends on what level of service you take. The basic analog and digital packages cost the same right now. But let’s be realistic: How often do changes not end up costing more?-VCRsIf the VCR just sits there and plays tapes of movies that your kids watch 10 times a week, you don’t need to bother with anything.If you get your TV from an antenna and record with your VCR, you’ll need a converter box leading into the VCR, but you shouldn’t need another box for your TV, in most cases.However, if you have separate antenna feeds into your VCR and TV - this would mean you can watch one channel and record another %26#150; both the TV and VCR will need boxes.-TiVoIf you have TiVo hooked to an analog antenna, it will depend on the age of your box. Many newer TiVos have digital receivers and don’t need converter boxes. Check your manual or your supplier.-Portable TVsSome newer models have digital receivers built in, and the manual should tell you. But many small TVs are still analog, and that means you’ll need a converter box.However, the converters won’t have their own power, or run on batteries, so you’ll likely only be able to use the little portable if you can plug it, and the box, into an outlet somewhere.For more info on the conversion, check the FCC Web site, www.dtv.gov, or call (888)225-5322.To order converter box coupons, or to get more information about them, go to www.dtv2009.gov or call (888)388-2009, or write TV Converter Box Coupon Program, P.O. Box 2000, Portland, OR 97208-2000.—And now, some actual television.Tuesday at 10 p.m.EST, NBC starts a new series, “quarterlife,” that’s the first official Internet-to-network drama. Actually, it’s a TV-to-Internet-to-TV drama, because the producers first tried to sell it to the networks.The show launched online in November, then NBC picked it up, and the network swears it had nothing do to with the fact writers were on strike at the time. It’s still all available in 30 eight-minute segments on www.quarterlife.com.All around, it would be a cool little development for TV - if the show were better. That’s both a disappointment and a surprise.That’s because “quarterlife” comes from accomplished producers Marshall Herskovitz and Edward Zwick, who created the brilliant teen drama “My So-Called Life” and the dead-on series “thirtysomething.” They clearly like to examine the little details of life, as well as to put the titles of their shows in lower case.This one splits in the middle on age. It’s about a bunch of mid-20-year-olds, who are, of course, trying to find themselves. The irony and intelligence are admirable, but “quarterlife” is missing the usual graceful touch. Instead of reflective, everyone just sounds whiney and self-involved, and it’s hard to stay with them long enough to get to like anyone.

Ratings flop: quarterlife heads for the after life

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

The highly touted web-based drama series quarterlife
proved a network television flop in its NBC debut, drawing the
network’s worst ratings for its time slot in at least 20 years,
Nielsen Media Research reported on Wednesday.
NBC had high hopes for the made-for-internet series, a show
about young adults designed to appeal to the very audience group -
viewers aged 18 to 49 - prized most by television advertisers.
But the show’s dismal performance in its prime-time network
launch on Tuesday threw its immediate future into doubt at the
General Electric-owned network, where a source said the series
could end up canceled before its next airing.
An NBC spokeswoman said quarterlife officially remained
on the network schedule for now. It had been slated to move to
Sundays on March 2.
But its initial broadcast on Tuesday ranked a distant third
place for the 10 p.m. hour, averaging 3.1 million viewers and a
meager 1.3 rating among the 18-49 crowd, the lowest for NBC in that
time period since Nielsen began measuring TV viewing by age with
“people meters” in 1987.
By comparison, NBC’s usual Tuesday 10 p.m. show, Law %26amp;
Order: Special Victims Unit, has consistently led the hour with
a 4.5 rating among adults 18-49 and more than 12 million viewers
overall.
quarterlife, dramatizing the urban lives of six young
artists, was originally created for the social-networking site
MySpace.com by Marshall Herskovitz and Ed Zwick, Emmy-winning
producers of thirtysomething and My So-Called
Life.
Consisting of 36 eight-minute “webisodes,” the series began
running on MySpace.TVcom and quarterlife.com in November, with two
new segments appearing online each week.
NBC made headlines when it announced in the midst of the
Hollywood writers strike it was picking up the series as a
mid-season replacement show, and has heavily promoted the drama in
the run-up to its prime-time launch.
At the time, quarterlife was touted as a new model for
the development of video entertainment, marking the first program
to originate independently online before moving to a major
broadcast outlet.
NBC Entertainment co-chairman Ben Silverman acknowledged in
remarks to The Hollywood Reporter on Wednesday the
experiment did not live up to expectations, but was “so worth the
try.”
“The website traffic went up a huge amount, and we continue to
try new things and new models,” he said. “It’s very inexpensive but
we hoped for higher ratings.”
The show’s network debut may have suffered somewhat from viewer
fatigue among its target audience given that the series has already
run online and cable network MTV aired segments of it the day of
its NBC premiere.
Reuters

RICK KUSHMAN: A primer on the coming digital wave

Sunday, February 24th, 2008

Earlier this week, we covered the 2009 conversion of TV to digital, except for all the really good questions that scores of people have asked since.I’m going to answer some of them today, but first, a quick reminder of what this is about.At midnight next Feb. 17, all analog television transmissions will stop, and TV signals will become digital. If you have any kind of digital cable or satellite service, or you get your reception from an antenna but have a digital receiver inside your TV, you won’t notice.If you use an antenna for an analog TV, you will need a converter box. Those run $50 to $70, and government discount coupons worth $40 are available. Each household can get two coupons, but sellers accept only one coupon per converter.Also, digital transmission is already going on, so you can switch at any time.After that, it gets a bit more detailed, and I’m going to break down the questions into a few basic categories:-Converter boxesEvery TV in the house needs its own digital connection, either through cable, satellite or a converter.The boxes are supposed to be very easy to connect, and you shouldn’t need to pay for help. The boxes are becoming available at most major electronics retailers.-CableIf you have cable, you won’t have to get a converter or shop for other equipment. But that doesn’t mean your cable company won’t force a change on you, and if they do, they’ll come to you.If you have digital cable now, nothing more is needed. But, if you have an analog box, or analog cable through a wall connection, it will depend on your company.Some cable companies will let you keep the analog equipment, and they’ll convert the signal for you. But many companies are switching to all-digital - because it’s better for them - meaning they’ll bring you a digital box.If they do go all-digital, each TV in the house will need its own box.Will that cost you more? It depends on what level of service you take. The basic analog and digital packages cost the same right now. But let’s be realistic: How often do changes not end up costing more?-VCRsIf the VCR just sits there and plays tapes of movies that your kids watch 10 times a week, you don’t need to bother with anything.If you get your TV from an antenna and record with your VCR, you’ll need a converter box leading into the VCR, but you shouldn’t need another box for your TV, in most cases.However, if you have separate antenna feeds into your VCR and TV - this would mean you can watch one channel and record another %26#150; both the TV and VCR will need boxes.-TiVoIf you have TiVo hooked to an analog antenna, it will depend on the age of your box. Many newer TiVos have digital receivers and don’t need converter boxes. Check your manual or your supplier.-Portable TVsSome newer models have digital receivers built in, and the manual should tell you. But many small TVs are still analog, and that means you’ll need a converter box.However, the converters won’t have their own power, or run on batteries, so you’ll likely only be able to use the little portable if you can plug it, and the box, into an outlet somewhere.For more info on the conversion, check the FCC Web site, www.dtv.gov, or call (888)225-5322.To order converter box coupons, or to get more information about them, go to www.dtv2009.gov or call (888)388-2009, or write TV Converter Box Coupon Program, P.O. Box 2000, Portland, OR 97208-2000.—And now, some actual television.Tuesday at 10 p.m.EST, NBC starts a new series, “quarterlife,” that’s the first official Internet-to-network drama. Actually, it’s a TV-to-Internet-to-TV drama, because the producers first tried to sell it to the networks.The show launched online in November, then NBC picked it up, and the network swears it had nothing do to with the fact writers were on strike at the time. It’s still all available in 30 eight-minute segments on www.quarterlife.com.All around, it would be a cool little development for TV - if the show were better. That’s both a disappointment and a surprise.That’s because “quarterlife” comes from accomplished producers Marshall Herskovitz and Edward Zwick, who created the brilliant teen drama “My So-Called Life” and the dead-on series “thirtysomething.” They clearly like to examine the little details of life, as well as to put the titles of their shows in lower case.This one splits in the middle on age. It’s about a bunch of mid-20-year-olds, who are, of course, trying to find themselves. The irony and intelligence are admirable, but “quarterlife” is missing the usual graceful touch. Instead of reflective, everyone just sounds whiney and self-involved, and it’s hard to stay with them long enough to get to like anyone.

A web of opportunity

Monday, February 4th, 2008

As the Writers Guild of America strike plays havoc with
television programming and TV execs pull their hair out over delays
on top-rating shows such as Lost and Desperate
Housewives, a creative outlet for small-screen writers is
emerging online.
Independent “web series” productions are starting to gain
popularity around the world. These programs, specifically created
for online viewing, might appeal to writers as a way to work with
fewer limitations.
US producer and writer Edward Zwick says individual creativity
is often compromised by commercial productions. “The business of
television today makes it harder for the individual filmmaker’s
voice to be heard,” he says in a media statement about his new
online show, quarterlife.
Zwick and Marshall Herskovitz, producers of the television shows
Thirtysomething and My So-Called Life, are
working together on the online show. Herskovitz says the internet
provides “a creative frontier with many untouched possibilities”
for productions such as quarterlife, which is aimed at
young people, or “twentysomethings”.
“We are portraying the lives of young people in their 20s
struggling to find themselves through their creativity,” he says.
“This series is all about how this generation … work, love, or
goof around … how they interact and communicate in the world
today. As we all know, they are obsessed with being online.”
Aired on MySpace and its own website, quarterlife is
one of the first independent web-based productions by professionals
established in the film and television industry. Herskovitz says
creating the web series “proved to be an exciting opportunity to
tell the quarterlife story and be part of this growing
online community”.
“Through artistic expression, and interacting with the
characters online through profiles and video blogs, members of the
quarterlife community will be invited to participate in the ongoing
creation of the series.” As exciting as it is for the likes of
Herskovitz, there is a significant challenge for these productions
to be financially viable, which is why quarterlife
premieres on Myspace before its own site.
It might be easier for big companies such as US pay TV channel
SciFi, which is exploring the commercial possibilities of internet
broadcasting. This year has proved eventful for SciFi with the
announcement of “new original online programming”, including
Invent This!, a show about “quirky” inventions;
development of a web series for the cancelled American-Australian
show Farscape and a series of “minisodes” for the TV show
Battlestar Galactica.
The online shows all feature an advertisement before the
selected video is played. It’s less than you get on TV but enough
for SciFi.com to maintain steady sponsorship. The Battlestar
Galactica minisodes were originally aired during another TV
show in SciFi, then released online as “webisodes”.
The decision to create these may have been due to online success
last year when SciFi released Battlestar Galactica: The
Resistance, a well-received series of webisodes, which
received high user-generated ratings and more than 200 comments on
the first webisode alone.
By connecting programming on its pay TV channel and its website,
SciFi can explore the possibilities of web shows using commercial
funding, but for independent web series, funding is still an
obstacle.
Queensland University of Technology PhD student Sue Davis says
this might be why the format hasn’t been explored as much before
now. “To produce material of quality takes effort and funds to
support the project,” she says. “In the past, companies found they
couldn’t make money, so cyberdramas have tended to be
community-based.” Davis created the Australian “cyberdrama”
Cleo Missing as part of her masters research, and also
runs a website, http://www.cyberdrama.org, with information on the
format.
She says online social networking and video-sharing sites are
precursors to serial web shows, which often encourage the
development of communities and discussions around the online
content.
“YouTube was a breakthrough in this area because it got people
sharing ideas and communicating through videos.”
Davis believes the internet also opens up different
entertainment and audiences. “One of the things you want online is
different audiences to films and television. The barriers that used
to be there for people online have been reduced as technology
continues to develop,” she says.
“It doesn’t mean we won’t use TV and film; they still play a big
role. People still want to get immersed in a great story, they
don’t necessarily want to sit in front of a computer. People want
different kinds of experiences.”
As with Herskovitz, Davis agrees audience involvement in any
web-based entertainment is important, but says it should not
compromise the story. “I think good drama should have a strong
narrative. For cyberdrama to work you have to have a good
story.”
As in any good TV show, Davis says, a web series should be
engaging and believable. A good example was lonelygirl15,
a web series broadcast on YouTube and originally believed to be a
true story of an isolated girl in the US.
“Lonelygirl15 was brilliant … so many people believed
it was real,” she says. “When it came out that it was actually a
made-up story, the reaction was incredible.”
British screenwriter Philip Gladwin, whose work includes
episodes of The Bill and the Doctor Who spin-off
series The Sarah Jane Adventures, sees the internet as
closely linked to television programming developments.
“It’s fairly clear to me and a lot of the TV people I know that
our future as writers-producers-directors is heavily bound up with
the future of the internet,” he says. At this stage the lack of
funding and the limited number of professional web series suggests
this future is not set in stone - as Davis points out, web shows
have been around for a while and have drawn little attention in the
past.
But Gladwin thinks the independence it could offer will be
enough for some writers to head in the direction of the
internet.
“Small budget with minimum interference is way more appealing
than big budget and a battle of attrition with the many layers of
script editors, execs, story consultants, series editors, producers
and channel controllers that control any project nowadays,” he
says.
Gladwin, like Zwick, thinks there are creative limitations with
working on film or TV shows.
“As a TV writer here in the UK, my immediate customer base
comprises a small number of gatekeepers … [who act] as an
impenetrable barrier between the work of any TV writer and their
audience.”
The “gatekeepers”, who financially support most TV and film
productions, might not back web shows but Gladwin says there are
ways around this obstacle.
“I’m talking a kind of grass roots internet TV, funded by
multiple product placement and sponsorship, and selling ads on the
page in an Adsense model.”
Web shows have been around in various forms, under different
names, for years. They may stay in the background or become more
popular as independent or commercial ventures. Either way, Gladwin
is one of many excited by the possibilities.
“The way the broadcasters are frantically developing their own
web-based projects suggests it won’t be too long now.”

Directors, Hollywood studios reach deal

Friday, February 1st, 2008

LOS ANGELES Hollywood directors reached a tentative contract deal Thursday with studios, a development that could turn up the pressure on striking writers to settle their 2-month-old walkout that has crippled the entertainment industry.”Two words describe this agreement - groundbreaking and substantial,” said Gil Cates, chair of the Directors Guild of America’s negotiations committee. “There are no rollbacks of any kind.”Among other things, the three-year agreement establishes key provisions involving compensation for programs offered on the Internet.That issue has been a key sticking point between striking writers and the studios, which broke off talks on Dec. 7.The writers walkout has halted work on dozens of TV shows, disrupted movie production, turned the glitzy Golden Globes show into a news conference and threatened the upcoming Academy Awards ceremony.The deal between directors and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which represents studios, was lauded by top executives from eight major companies, including Fox, Paramount Pictures Corp., The Walt Disney Co., CBS Corp., Sony Pictures Entertainment, Warner Bros., MGM and NBC Universal.In a joint statement, the executives said they hoped the agreement would signal the end of an “extremely difficult period for our industry.”They called on the writers guild to join in the kind of informal talks with industry leaders that preceded the directors’ negotiations, and said the deal with directors established a precedent for the industry’s creative talent to “participate financially in every emerging area of new media.”The Writers Guild of America said it would evaluate the terms of the directors’ proposed contract. The guild also reiterated that it has been calling on the studios to resume negotiations.”We’ve been making independent deals, so we’re in a negotiating mood,” said Writers Guild of America, West, President Patric Verrone, referring to interim agreements the guild has reached with companies such as United Artists and The Weinstein Co.Verrone declined to comment on specifics of the deal by directors or compare it to what the writers are seeking until he saw a copy of the proposed contract, which he expected to receive from the directors guild.Writers previously said directors do not represent their interests.Alliance President Nick Counter said in a statement that the directors’ talks focused on key issues, and the result was a groundbreaking agreement for the industry at large.”This deal was strongly influenced by the writers strike,” said Jonathan Handel, an entertainment lawyer in Los Angeles and a former counsel to the writers guild. “It shows all the earmarks of the improvements the writers were looking for - but it doesn’t achieve them by any means.”In the significant area of streaming media, the deal falls short of “fundamental fairness,” Handel said.However, he considers it unlikely the writers can get a better agreement.The deal with directors gives their union jurisdiction over programs produced for distribution on the Internet and sets a new residuals formula for some paid Internet downloads that essentially doubles the rate currently paid by employers, the guild said.In addition, it sets residual rates for ad-supported streaming and use of clips on the Internet.The deal was welcomed by others in Hollywood.”I’m very pleased with the new agreement and I hope it helps speed up the negotiations” with the writers guild, George Clooney said in a statement.Clooney has often commented on the need to resolve the strike to put thousands of people back to work in Hollywood.Roberta Reardon, president of the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, which represents actors, singers, dancers, announcers and others, called the deal encouraging and said her guild was optimistic the writers guild would resume negotiations soon.The directors guild was well-prepared when it started negotiations Jan. 12.It had spent $2 million researching the potential value of new media over the next decade and held a series of meetings with key studio heads to establish a basis for the formal talks.Gil Cates, who’s been involved in union contract negotiations for three decades, served as lead negotiator for directors.He is also producing this year’s Academy Awards, which are imperiled by the writers’ standoff.Last Sunday’s Golden Globes show was reduced to a news conference after actors refused to cross writers’ threatened picket lines.NBC lost millions of dollars in ad revenue, and award winners were deprived of instant publicity that could have provided a box-office bump.New media issues also were expected to dominate negotiations with the Screen Actors Guild, whose contract expires in June.The directors guild said late last year that it would delay the start of talks to give writers a chance to come to an agreement with studios.But the guild clearly lost patience after negotiations between the writers and studios broke off last month and the strike dragged on.Among other things, the studios’ deal with directors says programs produced for the Internet will be directed by guild members, with the exception of low-budget shows, and payments for downloaded TV programs and movies will be based on a distributor’s gross.Distributor’s gross represents the amount received by the company responsible for distributing the film or TV program on the Internet.The writers guild was seeking 2.5 percent of such grosses, about three times what the directors’ deal provides. Interim deals the writers guild has made with studios provide for 2 percent compensation on downloaded films and 2.5 percent on TV programs, the guild said Thursday.Under the proposed directors agreement, companies are contractually obligated to provide the guild “unfettered access to their deals and data,” the guild said, calling that unprecedented transparency.In their talks, the writers guild and studios clashed over using a percentage of gross receipts to determine Internet compensation.The guild said it sought that approach but was told by the alliance it was an unworkable and unacceptable formula.The studios offered, for example, a flat $250 payment for a year’s use of an hourlong TV show on the Web.The guild balked, citing the $20,000-plus residual that writers now earn for a single network rerun of a TV episode.Also at issue for the writers guild is unionization of reality and animation writers.Talks broke down after the alliance demanded the guild take that and other issues off the table, claiming there had been an agreement to drop it.The guild’s next move may be influenced by history.There’s a lingering resentment among members over what they considered raw deals in the 1980s involving what eventually became lucrative home-video and DVD markets.The writers guild home-video deal was shaped by a deal made previously by the directors guild, following an industry practice of pattern bargaining. That created resentment among some writers guild members toward the directors guild.

Directors, Hollywood studios reach deal

Wednesday, January 30th, 2008

LOS ANGELES Hollywood directors reached a tentative contract deal Thursday with studios, a development that could turn up the pressure on striking writers to settle their 2-month-old walkout that has crippled the entertainment industry.”Two words describe this agreement - groundbreaking and substantial,” said Gil Cates, chair of the Directors Guild of America’s negotiations committee. “There are no rollbacks of any kind.”Among other things, the three-year agreement establishes key provisions involving compensation for programs offered on the Internet.That issue has been a key sticking point between striking writers and the studios, which broke off talks on Dec. 7.The writers walkout has halted work on dozens of TV shows, disrupted movie production, turned the glitzy Golden Globes show into a news conference and threatened the upcoming Academy Awards ceremony.The deal between directors and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which represents studios, was lauded by top executives from eight major companies, including Fox, Paramount Pictures Corp., The Walt Disney Co., CBS Corp., Sony Pictures Entertainment, Warner Bros., MGM and NBC Universal.In a joint statement, the executives said they hoped the agreement would signal the end of an “extremely difficult period for our industry.”They called on the writers guild to join in the kind of informal talks with industry leaders that preceded the directors’ negotiations, and said the deal with directors established a precedent for the industry’s creative talent to “participate financially in every emerging area of new media.”The Writers Guild of America said it would evaluate the terms of the directors’ proposed contract. The guild also reiterated that it has been calling on the studios to resume negotiations.”We’ve been making independent deals, so we’re in a negotiating mood,” said Writers Guild of America, West, President Patric Verrone, referring to interim agreements the guild has reached with companies such as United Artists and The Weinstein Co.Verrone declined to comment on specifics of the deal by directors or compare it to what the writers are seeking until he saw a copy of the proposed contract, which he expected to receive from the directors guild.Writers previously said directors do not represent their interests.Alliance President Nick Counter said in a statement that the directors’ talks focused on key issues, and the result was a groundbreaking agreement for the industry at large.”This deal was strongly influenced by the writers strike,” said Jonathan Handel, an entertainment lawyer in Los Angeles and a former counsel to the writers guild. “It shows all the earmarks of the improvements the writers were looking for - but it doesn’t achieve them by any means.”In the significant area of streaming media, the deal falls short of “fundamental fairness,” Handel said.However, he considers it unlikely the writers can get a better agreement.The deal with directors gives their union jurisdiction over programs produced for distribution on the Internet and sets a new residuals formula for some paid Internet downloads that essentially doubles the rate currently paid by employers, the guild said.In addition, it sets residual rates for ad-supported streaming and use of clips on the Internet.The deal was welcomed by others in Hollywood.”I’m very pleased with the new agreement and I hope it helps speed up the negotiations” with the writers guild, George Clooney said in a statement.Clooney has often commented on the need to resolve the strike to put thousands of people back to work in Hollywood.Roberta Reardon, president of the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, which represents actors, singers, dancers, announcers and others, called the deal encouraging and said her guild was optimistic the writers guild would resume negotiations soon.The directors guild was well-prepared when it started negotiations Jan. 12.It had spent $2 million researching the potential value of new media over the next decade and held a series of meetings with key studio heads to establish a basis for the formal talks.Gil Cates, who’s been involved in union contract negotiations for three decades, served as lead negotiator for directors.He is also producing this year’s Academy Awards, which are imperiled by the writers’ standoff.Last Sunday’s Golden Globes show was reduced to a news conference after actors refused to cross writers’ threatened picket lines.NBC lost millions of dollars in ad revenue, and award winners were deprived of instant publicity that could have provided a box-office bump.New media issues also were expected to dominate negotiations with the Screen Actors Guild, whose contract expires in June.The directors guild said late last year that it would delay the start of talks to give writers a chance to come to an agreement with studios.But the guild clearly lost patience after negotiations between the writers and studios broke off last month and the strike dragged on.Among other things, the studios’ deal with directors says programs produced for the Internet will be directed by guild members, with the exception of low-budget shows, and payments for downloaded TV programs and movies will be based on a distributor’s gross.Distributor’s gross represents the amount received by the company responsible for distributing the film or TV program on the Internet.The writers guild was seeking 2.5 percent of such grosses, about three times what the directors’ deal provides. Interim deals the writers guild has made with studios provide for 2 percent compensation on downloaded films and 2.5 percent on TV programs, the guild said Thursday.Under the proposed directors agreement, companies are contractually obligated to provide the guild “unfettered access to their deals and data,” the guild said, calling that unprecedented transparency.In their talks, the writers guild and studios clashed over using a percentage of gross receipts to determine Internet compensation.The guild said it sought that approach but was told by the alliance it was an unworkable and unacceptable formula.The studios offered, for example, a flat $250 payment for a year’s use of an hourlong TV show on the Web.The guild balked, citing the $20,000-plus residual that writers now earn for a single network rerun of a TV episode.Also at issue for the writers guild is unionization of reality and animation writers.Talks broke down after the alliance demanded the guild take that and other issues off the table, claiming there had been an agreement to drop it.The guild’s next move may be influenced by history.There’s a lingering resentment among members over what they considered raw deals in the 1980s involving what eventually became lucrative home-video and DVD markets.The writers guild home-video deal was shaped by a deal made previously by the directors guild, following an industry practice of pattern bargaining. That created resentment among some writers guild members toward the directors guild.

Blogger star of new web series

Wednesday, January 30th, 2008

The social network announced today it had secured the exclusive

international distribution rights for Quarterlife, a new

series from Emmy award-winning producers Marshall Herskovitz and

Edward Zwick.

MySpace Australia spokesman Darain Faraz said the deal was just

the first of many shows it planned to offer through MySpace TV, which up until now has

consisted mainly of user-submitted clips.

He said within the next few weeks the site would announce a

number of “local content sharing deals” with Australian content

providers.

“We are on the verge of announcing some fairly huge stuff,” he

said.

MySpace has 3.8 million registered Australian users but its

growth rate now lags well behind Facebook’s, which earlier

this year surpassed 200,000 Australian users.

But where Facebook’s expansion is now being driven by

third-party applications, which have rapidly expanded the

functionality of the site, MySpace is looking to hold on to its

users through new features such as MySpace TV and Instant

Messenger.

Quarterlife, which will premier in seven languages on

MySpace’s global sites on November 11, delves into the lives of six

people in their 20s and charts their “coming of age as a part of

the digital generation”.

The show was unashamedly written to appeal to today’s tech-savvy

youth - the central character, a young woman named Dylan, is a

blogger whose video diary divulges a few too many of her friends’

closest secrets.

It purports to be a “truthful depiction of the way young people

speak, work, think, love, argue and express themselves”.

To that end, Herskovitz and Zwick - the force behind My

So-Called Life, thirtysomething, Legends of the

Fall and Blood Diamond - will invite their audience to

participate in the ongoing development of the series “through

writing and video submissions”.

There will be 36 episodes in total and the producers plan to

create a mini social network around the show through a website, quarterlife.com. It will also

have its own profile page on MySpace, which MySpace says will

include bonus content such as character profiles, behind-the-scenes

video footage and storyline secrets.

Herskovitz and Zwick said the fact Quarterlife was an

independent project meant they had full “creative autonomy”, which

isn’t always possible when producing shows for traditional TV

networks.

“For better or worse, Quarterlife is truly our own

vision,” Herskovitz said.

The Quarterlife concept was originally conceived three

years ago as a TV pilot called “%26#188; life”, developed for the US

network ABC. The project was axed due to “creative differences”

between the producers and ABC, after which the script was

completely rewritten for an internet audience.

“When Emmy award-winning producers come to MySpace TV - you know

this is reaching a whole new level,” Myspace CEO Chris DeWolfe said

in a statement.

In the US, MySpace has already dabbled extensively in digital

broadcasting, securing the rights to a number of smaller series and

short clips including the web series Prom Queen, a

teen-oriented serial drama made by a US studio owned by former

Disney boss Michael Eisner.

Archives

November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Other

Syndication