Web Development Live

Domains in Hong Kong, China and the Philippines have been named as the most potentially dangerous on the web.

A recent report by security firm McAfee found that the three nations had the highest percentage of malicious sites within their domain suffixes.

Researchers estimated that roughly 19 per cent of all sites ending with the .hk suffix posed some sort of security threat. Second place was China’s .cn with 11 per cent posing a security risk.

“Just like the real world, the virtual threats and risks are constantly changing,” said Jeff Green, senior vice president of product development at McAfee.

“As our research shows, sites that are safe today can be dangerous tomorrow. Surfing the web based on conventional wisdom is not enough to avoid risks.”

The .com domain, the most popular on the internet, was ninth riskiest overall, while .gov was the safest among the generic domains.

Finland’s .fi was ranked as the safest on the internet, with .05 per cent of sites posing a possible threat. Japan’s .jp and Norway’s .no rounded out the list of the three safest domains.

About 120 countries are developing ways to use the internet as a weapon to target financial markets, government computer systems and utilities, Internet security company McAfee said in an annual report.
Intelligence agencies already routinely test other states networks looking for weaknesses and their techniques are growing more sophisticated every year, it said.
Governments must urgently shore up their defences against industrial espionage and attacks on infrastructure.
Cybercrime is now a global issue, said Jeff Green, senior vice-president of McAfee Avert Labs. It has evolved significantly and is no longer just a threat to industry and individuals but increasingly to national security.
The report said China is at the forefront of the cyber war. It said China has been blamed for attacks in the United States, India and Germany. China has repeatedly denied such claims.
The Chinese were first to use cyber-attacks for political and military goals, James Mulvenon, director of the Centre for Intelligence and Research in Washington, was quoted as saying in the report.
The report was compiled with input from academics and officials from Britains Serious Organised Crime Agency, the US Federal Bureau of Investigation and Nato.
Cyber-attacks on private and government Web sites in Estonia in April and May this year were just the tip of the iceberg, the report warned.
Estonia said thousands of sites were affected in attacks aimed at crippling infrastructure in a country heavily dependent on the Internet.
The attacks appeared to have stemmed initially from Russia although the Kremlin denied any wrongdoing.
The complexity and co-ordination seen was new, the report quoted an unnamed Nato source as saying. There were a series of attacks with careful timing using different techniques and specific targets.
EU Information Society commissioner Viviane Reding said in June that what happened in Estonia was a wake-up call. Nato said urgent work was needed to improve defences.
The McAfee report predicted that future attacks would be even more sophisticated.
Attacks have progressed from initial curiosity probes to well-funded and well-organised operations for political, military, economic and technical espionage, it said.